Howle and Zudans would eviscerate the City of Vero Beach 7

COMMENTARY

“With a 4-person anti-city City Council majority, the challenge will not be to ‘Keep Vero Vero,’ but simply to ‘Keep Vero.'”

MARK SCHUMANN

If on Nov. 7 Vero Beach voters elect a Council majority determined to set in motion the eventual disincorporation of the City, it won’t be because they have beed duped. No, all the cards are on the table.

Candidates Harry Howle and Val Zudans, who seek to join Laura Moss and Lange Sykes in an insuppressible 4-person majority, have in the past made it crystal clear they want, not only to sell Vero Electric, but to divest the City of its other enterprise funds. If Howle and Zudans are elected, on the chopping block will be the water and sewer department, solid waste services, the marine, and possibly even the airport. The loss of all enterprise fund revenues will cripple the City, which is exactly what Howle and Zudans seek to do.

With a 4-person anti-city City Council majority, the challenge will not be to “Keep Vero Vero,” but simply to “Keep Vero.” Given that the power sale all but concluded, this year’s election is really not about who will provide Vero Beach with electric service. Rather, this election is about whether the people of Vero Beach want to continue to enjoy the benefits of an independent municipality. The alternative, of course, is to let the City be absorbed by Indian River County.

Are the people of Vero Beach really open to giving up their police department, their recreation programs, their well-maintained parks and guarded beaches? There is indeed a discernible difference in the level of services provided by the City and the County. This is what home rule is all about. A current example can be seen in the slowness with which the County is removing storm debris from the recent hurricane.

Press Journal columnist Larry Reisman recently wrote about delays in the County’s debris removal efforts:

Continue reading…

7 comments

  1. And I suppose attempting to extend the council members’ terms to 3 yrs would put us ‘in line’ with county until it can swallow up city? And the 3-yr terms would make it possible for big contributors having to put up their huge sums fewer times to get their in-pocket candidates into office again.

  2. If I were running for city council against Howle and Zudans, my motto would be SAVE VERO BEACH. The city is truly worth saving. In my opinion, every candidate should be asked if they intend to sell any existing city enterprise.

  3. Perhaps people need a history lesson here, in 2011 the pro sale Council passed an initial tax increase of 38% (the maximum allowed amount), at the same time the pro sale Council invited the County into talks about selling the Cities water and sewer system to them in exchange for taking on the existing debt of the Cities systems, basically giving away the system. The 38% tax increase was basically there to cover the loss of the transfer from water and sewer. The supposedly conservative Council members that were pushing for this was Pilar Turner, Tracy Carroll and Craig Fletcher, although Mr. Fletcher later didn’t go through with it. I have to thank him for that. When these candidates were running they were only for the sale of the electric system and pushed their conservatism and financial talents to the public, however their priority was raising taxes and selling water and sewer, and later conversations about selling the cemetery, single week garbage pickup, selling off the marina along with the dog park, major cuts to recreation and merging police dispatch with the County. This is factual that many of the Cities services have been up for sale, you can simply check the agendas and verify yourself. Today these two candidates are supported by the same people got the original pro sale group in, nothing really has changed, the County still wants our system and will put anyone in there to get it. However one thing of note, this year the County could not count to three, they need both Harry and Val to be elected to take the water and sewer system.

  4. As a side comment Val wrote in the April 13th 32963 magazine, page 50 “City Government should not be in the sewer and water business if the county can do it better at a lower cost.” Perhaps Val didn’t know that when the City gave County water and sewer rates to the County residences and the City actually made more money, meaning the City is lower in cost. And as for better, over 80% of the boil water notices are in the County, the Spoonbill marsh project lost its permit, and the Counties system is still losing money.

  5. I’m sure you will not approve this, but you should know people rolled their eyes that this came from you. “Isn’t he from a publishing family, one said.”

Comment - Please use your first and last name. Comments of up to 350 words are welcome.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s